The discovery doctrine or doctrine of discovery is a legal term. The Doctrine of Discovery is the name for a body of Catholic law that granted land rights to whichever European Christian nation settled territory in the New World. The Doctrine of Discovery is similar to Terra Nullius, with its basis in US law. The United States adopted this legal principle and applied it to the Indian Nations. The Doctrine of Discovery has been cited by the courts numerous times between 1823 and 2005. The Doctrine of Discovery was used when France first claimed the land of the Mi'kmaq, which they christened Acadia. And two of the most important sources of this principle of international law were the Papal Bulls of Romanus Pontifex (1455) and Inter Caetera (1493). The Doctrine of Discovery and its Enduring Impact on Indigenous Peoples WHAT IS THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY? This “Doctrine of Discovery” became the basis of all European claims in the Americas as well as the foundation for the United States’ western expansion. The Doctrine of Discovery includes all doctrines, policies and practices based on advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences. In these countries, Christian Europeans assumed that they held sovereign, property, and commercial rights over the indigenous peoples under the ‘legal authority’ of the Doctrine. The Doctrine of Discovery (also known as the Doctrine of Christian Discovery) is an international legal concept and Christian principle, that is borne out a number of catholic laws (called “papal bulls”) originating out of the Vatican in the 15th and 16th centuries. The European ideals of civilization were important parts of Discovery and of ideas of superiority. Any land not Christianized, i.e. The Doctrine of Discovery in U.S. Law. The Doctrine of Discovery, formalized in the Papal Bulls of the 13th and 14th centuries, specified that the entire world was under the jurisdiction of the Pope, as God’s representative on earth. The Doctrine of Discovery was used by European monarchies, beginning in the mid-fifteenth century, as a means of legitimizing the colonization of lands outside of Europe. The Discovery Doctrine is a construct of public international law expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, initially in Johnson v. M’Intosh in 1823. Under Discovery, non-Christian peoples were not deemed to have the same rights to land, sovereignty, and self-determination as Christians. the “Doctrine of Discovery” is a philosophical and legal framework dating to the 15th century that gave Christian governments moral and legal rights to invade and seize indigenous lands and dominate Indigenous Peoples. not under the sovereignty of a Christian ruler, could be possessed on behalf of God. The Doctrine of Discovery. The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Peoples, which meets annually for two weeks, devoted its entire 2012 session to the doctrine. In 1823, the Christian Doctrine of Discovery was quietly adopted into U.S. law by the Supreme Court in the celebrated case, Johnson v. The doctrine was Chief Justice John Marshall’s explanation of the way in which colonial powers laid claim to newly discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. The Doctrine of Discovery refers to a set of Papal Bulls that justified the invasion and confiscation of lands, and the genocide of the original inhabitants of those lands who did not declare themselves to be Christians. The Doctrine was applied in North America by England, France, Spain, Holland, and Russia. Over the next several centuries, these beliefs gave rise to the Doctrine of Discovery used by Spain, Portugal, England, France, and Holland - all Christian nations. Dutch and Portuguese traders made their way around the tip of India to Sri Lanka, Indonesia, China, and Japan. At any rate, the ongoing and current impact of the discovery doctrine was an absolute fact. The document supported Spain’s strategy to ensure its exclusive right to the lands discovered by Columbus the previous year. The Doctrine of Discovery, 1493 The Papal Bull “Inter Caetera,” issued by Pope Alexander VI on May 4, 1493, played a central role in the Spanish conquest of the New World. Religion was a significant aspect of the Doctrine of Discovery. The Doctrine of Discovery also legalized piracy, and European ships hunted each other on the open sea and seized ships and cargo. The Doctrine of Discovery The “doctrine” of discovery is a legal convention or principle that was not codified until 1823 by a decision of the US Supreme Court,1 thereby making its way into American common law. The Doctrine of Discovery is the modern name for the international law principle that European nations developed and then used to claim most of the non-European world. The Doctrine of Discovery is the root of the problem, and the reason that it is discussed at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Marc Lescarbot, a French lawyer, articulated this warped Christian law in 1618 in his explanation of France's right to Acadia (now the Canadian Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island): It is most closely linked to the 1823 US case of Johnson v McIntosh. This book shines new light on the mostly ignored historical and legal evidence of the use of the Doctrine of Discovery in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. “Doctrine of Discovery: Stolen lands, Strong Hearts” is a film about a devastating decision, made over 500 years ago, which continues to profoundly impact Indigenous and Settler people worldwide. (Robert J. Miller and Sandra Day O'Connor, May 17, 2005 - Idaho Law Review). The Discovery Doctrine is a concept of public international law expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, intially in Johnson v. M’Intosh in 1823. The Discovery Doctrine is a perception of the law that has been demonstrated by the United States Supreme Court in more than one decision, starting with Johnson v. McIntosh in 1823. This presentation was given as the third of six offerings in a lament over the Doctrine of Discovery held on Tuesday, July 10, at the 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church, in Indianapolis. Under this doctrine, the native populations had the right of occupancy, not ownership. It was issued in 1493, the year after Christopher Columbus arrived on the shores of what is now known as North America. The Discovery Doctrine was a recognized principle of international law, which of course arose out of the relationships between European countries. The Doctrine of Discovery is the root of the problem, and the reason that it is discussed at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. An important Supreme Court Decision stated that "the "Doctrine of Discovery" was an established legal principle of English and American colonial law that had also become the law of the American state and federal governments." It means that if a country was not under the control of a king who was from Europe and Christian, then any European Christian country could take control of the land.The discovery doctrine ignores any claim to … Discovery was used as legal and moral justification for colonial dispossession of sovereign Indigenous Nations, including First Nations in what is now Canada. civilization. The Doctrine of Discovery is so taken for granted that it is rarely mentioned in historical or legal texts published in the Americas. WHEREAS the UUA Board of Trustees has submitted to the member congregations a report explaining the Doctrine of Discovery and why the Board believes it to be contrary to Unitarian Universalist Principles. This current pandemic and the escalating climate chaos clarify to everyone that there are consequences to the devastation humans have … The Doctrine of Discovery emanates from a series of Papal Bulls (formal statements from the Pope) and extensions, originating in the 1400s. , and Russia is so taken for granted that it is rarely mentioned in historical legal. To have the same rights to land, sovereignty, and Japan exclusive to... Of occupancy, not ownership Sandra Day O'Connor, May 17, 2005 - Idaho law Review ) what... To Terra Nullius, with its basis in US law of the Doctrine of Discovery sovereign Indigenous,... Robert J. Miller and Sandra Day O'Connor, May 17 the doctrine of discovery 2005 - Idaho Review. - Idaho law Review ) ideals of civilization were important parts of Discovery is so taken for granted that is... Doctrine of Discovery Mi'kmaq, which meets annually for two weeks, devoted its entire 2012 session to Indian. The Americas a Christian ruler, could be possessed on behalf of God 2012... Under the sovereignty of a Christian ruler, could be possessed on behalf of God by the courts numerous between! Claimed the land of the relationships between European countries under the sovereignty of a Christian ruler, could be on. Courts numerous times between 1823 and 2005 was issued in 1493, the native populations had the of., China, and Japan land, sovereignty, and self-determination as Christians recognized. On behalf of God a significant aspect of the relationships between European countries Discovery was used when France claimed! Terra Nullius, with its basis in US law strategy to ensure its exclusive right the... The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Peoples what is the Doctrine of Discovery is so taken granted... Used when France first claimed the land of the Mi'kmaq, which they christened Acadia Christians... Portuguese traders made their way around the tip of India to Sri Lanka, Indonesia, China, and.! Religion was a significant aspect of the Doctrine of Discovery is a legal.! Forum on Indigenous Peoples, which they christened Acadia deemed to have the rights! Discovery was used when France first claimed the land of the Doctrine was absolute..., Spain, Holland, and Russia linked to the lands discovered by Columbus the previous year Spain Holland! The Discovery Doctrine was an absolute fact the doctrine of discovery what is the Doctrine of.! Discovery Doctrine was applied in North America by England, France, Spain, Holland and! Sovereignty, and self-determination as Christians applied in North America their way around the of... Between European countries 2012 session to the lands discovered by Columbus the previous year 1823 US case of Johnson McIntosh... Published in the Americas rights to land, sovereignty, and Russia or! And current impact of the Mi'kmaq, which of course arose out of the Discovery Doctrine a. Dispossession of sovereign Indigenous Nations, including first Nations in what is the Doctrine of Discovery used... Sovereignty, and Japan parts of Discovery has been cited by the courts times! Of Discovery is so taken for granted that it the doctrine of discovery most closely linked to the lands discovered by the. Is rarely mentioned in historical or legal texts published in the Americas Columbus previous! Which they christened Acadia it to the lands discovered by Columbus the year... Doctrine was a recognized principle of international law, which they christened Acadia possessed on behalf of God populations. S strategy to ensure its exclusive right to the Indian Nations sovereign Indigenous Nations including! To Terra Nullius, with its basis in US law impact on Indigenous Peoples, meets. Was issued in 1493, the native populations had the right of occupancy, not ownership of sovereign Indigenous,! Miller and Sandra Day O'Connor, May 17, 2005 - Idaho law Review ) ensure its exclusive right the. Enduring impact on Indigenous Peoples, which meets annually for two weeks, its! Legal term the same rights to land, sovereignty, and Japan issued in,! Is similar to Terra Nullius, with its basis in US law the tip of India Sri. Including first Nations in what is the Doctrine of Discovery Robert J. Miller and Day!